|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
ИПМех РАН |
||
Syntax or Phonology? Proclitics, Enclitics and Stress in Hittiteстатья
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 8 сентября 2021 г.
- Авторы: Sideltsev A., Molina M., Alexius Belov
- Журнал: Вопросы языкового родства
- Том: 13
- Номер: 2
- Год издания: 2015
- Издательство: Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский государственный гуманитарный университет
- Местоположение издательства: Москва
- Первая страница: 139
- Последняя страница: 168
- Аннотация: The paper deals with the syntax of mān “if”, namma “then”, našma “or”, perfectivising kāša/kāšma, relative and indefinite pronouns as well as some subordinators in Hittite against the background of other Indo-European languages, particularly Latin and Greek. It has been re-cently proposed that their position in the clause and syntactic behaviour are either partiallyor fully determined by their being either proclitics or enclitics. We review the proposals andargue that purely phonological rules are highly unlikely for any of the constituents. A purelysyntactic account is put forward to fully capture the data. It is particularly noteworthy thatfrom the IE perspective Hittite is radically different from Narrow IE languages (like OldGreek) where indefinite pronouns are normally unstressed: all the Hittite data which are atfirst sight similar to Narrow IE turn out to be secondary independent innovations of Hittiteand cannot serve as the basis of Indo-Hittite reconstruction.
- Добавил в систему: Белов Алексей Михайлович