Information society vs knowlede society: a statement the problemстатья
Информация о цитировании статьи получена из
Web of Science
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 4 сентября 2019 г.
Аннотация:The European Proceedings ofSocial & Behavioural SciencesEpSBSFuture Academy ISSN:2357-1330This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.02.291SCTCMG2018 International Scientific Conference “Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism”INFORMATION SOCIETY VS KNOWLEDE SOCIETY: A STATEMENT THE PROBLEM M.G. Abramova (a)*, A.V. Popova(b)*Correspondingauthor(a) Moscow State University, 119192, Lomonosov Avenue, 27, block 4,Moscow, Russia,(b) Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49, Leningradsky Avenue, 125993, Moscow, Russia,AbstractThearticledefinesthefeatures of the information society and knowledge society’ theories, which underliemodern development tendencies ofsocial-humanitarian knowledge. Theintentionofthearticle is to prove the necessity of more detailed heritage’ studies based on comparative analysis of these theories representatives, primarily American scientists who are developing the basics of postindustrial society. Takingintoconsiderationthepostulatesofinformationsociety’ theory, the following conclusion is drawn:post-industrial (information) societyis based on the principles ofminority, semi-direct democracyand shared responsibility in decision-making. MuchattentionisgiventothenegativeconsequencesofRussia blind following the western doctrine of information society construction. As opposed to the information theory,the knowledge theory starts to develop, whichis about providing opportunities to check the validity of the information, comparing it with other information types, grading and comprehending it,while using general scientific methodology, with the aim of new system building and reproducing it based on received information by any party concerned. Themethodproposedisaboutusinghermeneutics, ways of interpreting legal and political textsand formal logic,scientific works of researched representatives’theories systematic analysis. Thefollowingconclusionsaredrawn: it is necessary to build knowledgesocietyinRussiabased on the achievements of information society, as also on the development of fundamental sciencesopposed to the current priority ofapplied knowledgewith the purpose offurthersocial and legal state strengthening