|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
ИПМех РАН |
||
COVID-19 and subjective well-being: perceived impact, positive psychological resources and protective behaviorстатья
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка RSCI Web of Science
Информация о цитировании статьи получена из
Web of Science,
Scopus
Статья опубликована в журнале из перечня ВАК
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 14 октября 2021 г.
- Авторы: Bokhan T.G., Galazhinsky E.V., Leontiev D.A., Rasskazova E.I., Terekhina O.V., Ulyanich A.L., Shabalovskaya M.V., Bogomaz S.A., Vidyakina T.A.
- Журнал: Психология. Журнал Высшей Школы экономики
- Том: 18
- Номер: 2
- Год издания: 2021
- Издательство: Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Национальный исследовательский университет "Высшая школа экономики"
- Местоположение издательства: Москва
- Первая страница: 259
- Последняя страница: 275
- DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2021-2-259-275
- Аннотация: While negative psychological effects of COVID-19 pandemic are actively studied, little is knownabout the eventual positive reactions to the pandemic including the capacity to see positiveopportunities in this situation and about personality resources that may help to cope and tomaintain well-being despite lifestyle restrictions. The aim of our study was to reveal positive personality resources that contribute to buffering the negative effects and its consequences on individual lives. 474 adults 18-81 years old from Siberia (Russia) participated in May 2020 in a survey about the impact of the pandemic and self-isolation and also filled out psychometric measures of well-being and psychological resources (PANAS, PWI, Value of Life Scale, MHC,MSTAT-I, LOT, GSE, Hardiness Survey, SOC, Personal Life Position inventory). One in threerespondents reported worsening emotional condition through the previous two weeks and pooradherence to governmental self-isolation recommendations, and 43.6% reported increased financial difficulties. Taking into account not only the negative but also positive subjective effect ofthe pandemic enabled the improved accuracy in prediction of both well-being and adherence tothe governmental measures. The less a person mentioned the positive side of the pandemic, themore strongly their adherence to the governmental measures depended on perceived negativeeffects (worries and threats). Tolerance for ambiguity, the challenge component of hardiness, harmony with life predicted perceived positive effects after adjusting for negative effects.Psychological resources could play a buffering role as regards the vulnerability to negative psychological effects of the pandemic and help to find positive opportunities.
- Добавил в систему: Рассказова Елена Игоревна