|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
ИПМех РАН |
||
Assessment of low-energy high repetition rate DPSS laser for quantitative analysis of marine ferromanganese nodules by LIBSстатья
Статья опубликована в высокорейтинговом журнале
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus- Авторы: Popov Andrey M., Akhmetzhanov Timur F., Drozdova Anastasiya N., Kalko Ildar, Labutin Timur A., Zaytsev Sergey M.
- Журнал: Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
- Том: 37
- Год издания: 2022
- Издательство: Royal Society of Chemistry
- Местоположение издательства: United Kingdom
- DOI: 10.1039/D2JA00127F
- Аннотация: Analysis of oceanographic objects aboard the ship requires a method capable of express direct analysis. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) can be an adequate solution for this task. However, conventional laboratory setups are too bulky and fragile for on-board application. For this reason, we present the study on the application of prototype mobile setup for determination of Mn, Fe, Ca, Sr and Ti in marine ferromanganese nodules (FMN) from Kara Sea. We investigated miniaturisation of the experimental setup and considered possible inhomogeneity of FMNs by using a portable air-cooled DPSS laser (λ = 527 nm, E = 0.25 mJ/pulse) with high-repetition rate. Additional miniaturisation was studied by comparing two different detection systems - a portable non-gated CCD spectrometer (spectral range 400-505 nm, resolution 0.1 nm, 2048 pixels) and an ICCD camera coupled with a high-aperture Cherny-Turner spectrograph (spectral range 200-530 nm, resolution up to 150 000). Both detectors showed fairly similar R2 of calibration - 0.971-0.999 for CCD and 0.984-0.999 for ICCD. We compared LIBS results to those obtained by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) and used ICP-AES as a reference method. It is shown that determination of Fe and Mn by EDXRF and LIBS with iCCD camera provides similar results while miniaturisation by means of compact CCD spectrometer leads to a decrease in accuracy by ~65 %. On the other hand, LIBS is able to provide up to 3 times better results than EDXRF for Ca, Sr and Ti. Further statistical treatment shows that LIBS results are generally closer to the reference rather than EDXRF in terms of median values. The difference between CCD and iCCD here lies in the interquartile range which is wider for the majority of elements in case of the portable spectrometer. Thus, LIBS can be considered a valuable tool for rapid onboard analysis of complex marine FMN samples prior to more accurate yet time-consuming methods such as ICP-AES/MS.
- Добавил в систему: Попов Андрей Михайлович
Прикрепленные файлы
| № | Имя | Описание | Имя файла | Размер | Добавлен |
|---|