Socioeconomic Situation of Russian Urban Agglomerations in 2015–2021

Abdullaev, A.M.; Zemlyanskii, D.Y.; Kalinovskii, L.V.; Medvednikova, D.M.

Авторы: Abdullaev A.M., Zemlyanskii D.Yu, Kalinovskii L.V., Medvednikova D.M.
Журнал: Regional Research of Russia
Том: 14
Номер: 2
Год издания: 2024
Издательство: Pleiades Publishing, Ltd
Местоположение издательства: Road Town, United Kingdom
Первая страница: 143
Последняя страница: 159
DOI: 10.1134/s2079970524600045
Аннотация: The article gives a comparative assessment of the features and trends in the development of urbanagglomerations of the Russian Federation in 2015–2021 based on a set of key socioeconomic indicators. Aspecial feature of the study is the testing of a method for assessing the level of economic development of urbanagglomerations using data from the Russian Federal Tax Service on the volume of tax revenues. The analysisconfirms that urban agglomerations make an extremely high contribution to the economic development ofthe country and continue to form the basis for growth of the tax economy. The largest contribution to countrydevelopment indicators is still made by the largest Moscow urban agglomeration; the concentration ofresources within its borders has only increased in recent years. The differentiation of the remaining urbanagglomerations among themselves is great, and their total contribution in a number of indicators is compara-ble to that of the Moscow urban agglomeration. Urban agglomerations with pronounced industrial special-ization show the best economic results, but development of the economic complex in them does not have anincentivizing effect on the growth of labor market indicators, household incomes and, as a consequence, ser-vice sectors. The least developed urban agglomerations remain those with a high role of shadow sectors in theeconomy and those that were administratively appointed rather than allocated as a result of natural develop-ment (Ulan-Ude, Penza, and Ryazan urban agglomerations). Such urban agglomerations are located inregions of the country with a depressed economic situation. Reduced values are also typical of many urbanagglomerations of the Volga region. Within individual urban agglomerations, there is a clear manifestation ofcenter–periphery differences in most indicators; however, the study showed that the level of development ofurban agglomeration cores and suburbs is not always high, and the positive influence of the urban agglomer-ation core rarely extends beyond the near belt. The results of the study give grounds to propose a narrowerapproach when delimiting the boundaries of urban agglomerations, and also prove that current governmentmeasures for the development of urban agglomerations in the country (except for Moscow urban agglomera-tion) have not yet had a significant impact on accelerating economic growth and expanding the geography ofinfluence of agglomeration factors.
Добавил в систему: Землянский Дмитрий Юрьевич

	ИСТИНА	Войти в систему Регистрация
	ИПМех РАН
	Главная Поиск Статистика О проекте Помощь

ИСТИНА

ИПМех РАН

Socioeconomic Situation of Russian Urban Agglomerations in 2015–2021статья

Прикрепленные файлы