|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
ИПМех РАН |
||
Facial and body sexual dimorphism are not interconnected in the Maasaiстатья
- Авторы: Butovskaya Marina L., Rostovtseva Victoria V., Mezentseva Anna A.
- Журнал: Journal of physiological anthropology
- Том: 41
- Номер: 1
- Год издания: 2022
- Издательство: Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology
- Местоположение издательства: Japan
- DOI: 10.1186/s40101-021-00276-8
- Аннотация: BackgroundIn this paper, we investigate facial sexual dimorphism and its’ association with body dimorphism in Maasai, the traditional seminomadic population of Tanzania. We discuss findings on other human populations and possible factors affecting the developmental processes in Maasai.MethodsFull-face anthropological photographs were obtained from 305 Maasai (185 men, 120 women) aged 17–90 years. Facial shape was assessed combining geometric morphometrics and classical facial indices. Body parameters were measured directly using precise anthropological instruments.ResultsSexual dimorphism in Maasai faces was low, sex explained 1.8% of the total shape variance. However, male faces were relatively narrower and vertically prolonged, with slightly wider noses, narrower-set and lower eyebrows, wider mouths, and higher forehead hairline. The most sexually dimorphic regions of the face were the lower jaw and the nose. Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR), measured in six known variants, revealed no significant sexual dimorphism. The allometric effects on facial traits were mostly related to the face growth, rather than the growth of the whole body (body height). Significant body dimorphism was demonstrated, men being significantly higher, with larger wrist diameter and hand grip strength, and women having higher BMI, hips circumferences, upper arm circumferences, triceps skinfolds. Facial and body sexual dimorphisms were not associated.ConclusionsFacial sex differences in Maasai are very low, while on the contrary, the body sexual dimorphism is high. There were practically no associations between facial and body measures. These findings are interpreted in the light of trade-offs between environmental, cultural, and sexual selection pressures.
- Добавил в систему: Мезенцева Анна Александровна